Sigh, I just read Nightshade's weblog. I felt mostly the same way. I know we gave the defence sufficient evidence to blow a large enough hole for the accused to slip through. I don't know why the couldn't see it, but the letter from 'Legris' of the Cappadocian's was from a Cainite of sufficent stature to cast a shadow over her accusers allegations, given they had the same status! What we got however was a hodgepodge of little facts which didn't get formed into a cohesive accusation against another Cainite of worth, backed by the powerful words of a Cappadocian Elder.
To my players who read my blog, I am sorry. I am very dissapointed with the game that I thought was going to be a spectacular clash of charisma between Castile and Leoninius, resulted in a fizzle. I don't know why there was the perception that everyone else needed to be glued to the (dull) trial, there was the rest of the site for them to use. Oh Well! We hope to have the Prince of Wales Armouries for the next game.
